Innovation in learning
By Kris Foster
Learn by doing. That’s John Kleefeld’s teaching philosophy summed up in three words.
Those three words—woven throughout classes, assignments, group projects and exams—helped earn Kleefeld, assistant professor in the College of Law, this year’s Provost's Award for Outstanding Innovation in Learning.
“Professional colleges need practice. That helps students learn the intellectual doctrine and theory as well as building necessary skills,” explained Kleefeld, who practices what he preaches by working as a lawyer on certain pro bono cases. “I like to find a point somewhere between pure theory and practice.”
In 2008, while at the University of British Columbia, Kleefeld developed a new pedagogy for a negotiating class he taught: conducting negotiations by email. He has continued to refine the method since starting at the U of S in 2010.
“Using email to conduct negotiations teaches a number of skills beyond critical negotiating skills. It teaches how to develop a rapport and build trust in a low-context communication setting without the visual or verbal cues that are available in face-to-face contact. It also demonstrates a number of pitfalls. You can learn a lot from mistakes, and in this simulation, there is no damage to clients.”
Negotiation by email is becoming very common in the legal profession as well, he said. “It presents excellent opportunities because it is immediate and time zones don’t affect negotiations. It also allows time to think before responding. It is a great blend of telephone and mail.”
Kleefeld breaks the class into groups of two and those groups negotiate with a counterpart group on a simulated case. To make the negotiations more realistic and to ensure that the negotiators do not know each other, Kleefeld and some of his colleagues at the College of Law have partnered U of S teams with student groups from other universities, including the Universities of Manitoba, Alberta, Windsor and, most recently, Southern Methodist University in Texas.
“The negotiations run for 10 days and a transcript of the emails is saved,” he explained. “I review them and provide detailed feedback, and each team reviews the transcript of one other team. Then we do a debriefing session in class so students can see how their classmates approached the same case. Students have said that this is the most realistic simulation they have ever done.”
It is so successful in fact, that Kleefeld upped the ante this year. “We expanded this into a criminal law plea bargaining class and added a client to the email exchange to build in more complexity. The simulation was based on a real case, used with the client’s permission and altered to protect client confidentiality.”
But for Kleefeld. the real payoff comes not in the form of awards, but from eureka moments. “It is energizing and very satisfying when you witness people learn. The discovery process is fascinating to me. I feel privileged to teach such great students who are enthusiastic to learn from me and, as importantly, from each other. So much learning takes place outside of class, it is very important.”